For once, I guess I have to agree with Sarah Palin, thats not an appropriate cover. I really do wonder who would have approved of that and thought it was a good idea. It'd be different if she was an athelete, but she's a politician, and should be covered as such... Dunno...
From Jezebel
2 comments:
There may be a valid point except that she repeatedly posed in her running gear and similar clothing. And a large part of the article was the point that she was using sex appeal.
It wasn't a good thing by any stretch of the imagination but this isn't a real occasion to clutch our pearls.
Perhaps, but she posed in her running gear for a running magazine, TIME just used that photo. She didn't pose for TIME as such was my thought. Surely TIME has more photos available?
Post a Comment